STANLEY Z. PECH PRIZE
At the 1985 annual meeting in Washington, D. C., the
CSA adopted a motion by Stanley Winters to create an award to be given every
two years for an outstanding article published by a member of the Czechoslovak
History Conference, now the Czechoslovak Studies Association. It was later determined to name the award in honor of Stanley
2008 PECH PRIZE COMPETITION
(Articles published in 2006-2007)
Sheilagh Ogilvie, “‘So that Every Subject Knows How to
Behave’: Social Disciplining in Early Modern Bohemia,”
Comparative Studies in Society & History, vol. 48, no. 1 (January 2006):
In the article, Ogilvie investigates the
applicability of the theory of “social disciplining”—which links authorities’
attempts to regulate people’s private lives to the emergence of the early
modern capitalist state in Europe—to east-central and eastern Europe, where
“refeudalization” or the “second serfdom” put most of the control over private
subjects into the hands of noble landlords rather than the rationalizing state
and where the development of capitalist market conditions was deliberately
impeded by these same landlords. Ogilvie moves beyond the confrontation of
western theory with eastern realities, however, because, as she eloquently
argues, the “very general comparative questions with wide-ranging implications
for our understanding of early modern European society” generated by this
confrontation “cannot be satisfactorily addressed using evidence generated at
a similar level of generality” (39).
For her micro-study of social disciplining, Ogilvie analyzes a unique data
source, a set of manorial ordinances and manorial court records, both covering
most of the seventeenth century for the large Bohemian estate of Friedland/Frýdlant.
This data allows Ogilvie to compare details of regulation to details of actual
enforcement, and thus to confront the theory of social disciplining, often
based on only the regulatory evidence, with actual disciplinary practice. She
thus addresses the unresolved conflict in discussions of social disciplining
over whether the regulatory initiatives had any real effect, while drawing
important distinctions between western and eastern Europe.
Ogilvie finds that regulations in Friedland/Frýdlant were selectively
enforced, and that whatever the modernizing and rationalizing intentions of
those who wrote the regulations, they were enforced only when that best served
the interests of two institutions with feudal roots, the manor and the peasant
commune. This brief summary can hardly do justice to the subtlety of her
arguments and her thoughtful, creative analysis of an impressive cache of
research materials. Her conclusions promise to generate vibrant debate and her
approach has the potential to transform the discussion of social disciplining,
compelling it to become more grounded in enforcement data and thus better
contextualized. She shows how scholars in our field can remain sensitive to
the peculiarities of our region while engaging with larger, European issues
and debates. We are very pleased, therefore, to award this article the 2008
THE NEXT PECH PRIZE COMPETITION
Return to Top
The next Pech Prize competition will be held in 2010, accepting articles
published in 2008 and 2009.
The rules for the award are:
- The amount of the prize shall be determined by the
President of the Czechoslovak History Conference with the concurrence of the
Executive Committee within three months after the biennial election of officers.
- Essays submitted shall have been published or accepted
for publication in a professional journal or a volume of essays and shall
deal with topics of the peoples of Czechoslovakia within and without its historical
- Other things being equal, the prize judges shall give
preference to essays by recent Ph.D.s over others.
- Candidates for the prize may be identified by author
self nomination, submission by a Czechoslovak History Conference member, or
by members of the Stanley Z. Pech Prize Committee, with the criterion for
eligibility being the author's membership in the Czechoslovak History Conference.
- The President of the Czechoslovak History Conference
shall, within three months of his/her election, appoint a Prize Committee
of three members, including one member that he/she shall designate as chairperson,
which Committee shall evaluate the submitted essays and transmit their decision
to the President for announcement and presentation of the Prize at the next
annual meeting of the Czechoslovak History Conference.
- One prize only shall be awarded and the name of the
recipient shall be the only one to be made public, subject to the decision
of the Committee.
PAST PECH PRIZE WINNERS
- Return to Top
Peter Bugge, "The Making of a Slovak City The Czechoslovak Renaming of
Pressburg/Pozsony/Presporok, 1918–19," Austrian History Yearbook 35
Bruce R. Berglund,
“Building a Church for a New Age: The Search for a Modern Catholic Art in
Turn-of-the-century Central Europe,” Centropa, vol. 3 no. 3 (September 2003):
Katherine David-Fox, “Prague-Vienna, Prague-Berlin: The Hidden
Geography of Czech Modernism" in Slavic Review, 59, no. 4 (Winter 2000)
- Karl F. Bahm, “Beyond the
Bourgeoisie: Rethinking Nation, Culture and Modernity in Nineteenth-Century
Central Europe,” in Austrian History Yearbook, 29, part 1 (1998) 19-35.
- Igor Lukes, “The Slansky Affair:
New Evidence,” in Slavic Review, 58, no. 1 (Spring 1999) 160-187.
- Anna Drabek, “Die Frage der
Unterrichtssprache im Königreich Böhmen im Zeitalter der Aufklärung,” in
Österreichische Osthelfte 38 (1996) 329-355.
- Claire Nolte, “Our Brothers Across
the Ocean: The Czech Sokol in America to 1914,” in Czechoslovak and Central
European Journal, 2, no. 2 (Winter 1993) 15-37.
- Hillel Kieval, "The Social Vision
of Bohemian Jews: Intellectuals and Community in the 1840s" in Jonathan
Frankel and Steven J. Zipperstein , eds., Assimilation and Community: The
Jews in Nineteenth-Century Europe, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge
University Press, 1992.
V. Johnson, “Newspapers and Nation-building: The Slovak Press in Pre-1918
Slovakia,” in Hans Lemberg et al, eds., Bildungsgeschichte,
Bevölkerungsgeschichte, Gesellschaftsgeschichte in den Böhmischen
Ländern und Europa, Vienna: Verlag für Geschichte und Politik, 1988, pp.
F. McDermott, “Dependence or Independence? Relations between the Red Unions
and the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia, 1922-1929,” in Stanislav J.
Kirschbaum, ed., East European History.
Papers of the Third World Congress for Soviet and East European Studies,
Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers, 1988, pp. 157-83.