Example: \[
A = \{4, 5, 6 \} = \{ n \in \mathbb{N} : 3 < n < 7 \}
\]
Operations & relations
Union:\(A \cup B = \{x: x\in A \text{ or } x \in B\}\).
Intersect:\(A \cap B = \{x: x \in A \text{ and } x \in B\}\).
Minus:\(A \setminus B = \{ x: x\in A \text{ and } \not\in B \}\)
Product:\(A \times B = \{(x,y): x \in A, y \in B \}\)
Power set:\(\mathcal{P}(A) =\) set of all subsets of \(A\)
Subset\(A \subseteq B\) means that if \(a\in A\) then \(a \in B\)
\(A \subset B\) means \(A \subseteq B\) and \(\exists b \in B\) such that \(b \not\in A\)
Relations
Relations
relation on two sets \(A\) and \(B\) is any subset of \(A \times B\), \(R \subseteq A \times B\). We usually denote relations by \(a \sim_R b\) if \((a,b) \in R\)
Example: \(A=B=\mathbb{R}\), \(<\) is associated with \(R_{<} = \{(a,b) \in \mathbb{R}^2 : a<b \}\)
complete: for any \(a, b \in A\), either \(a \preceq b\) or \(b \preceq a\) (or both)
Example: preference relation
Pareto order
\(n\) individuals, preferences \(\succeq_i\)
Pareto order: \[
x \succeq^P y \text{ if } x \succeq_i y \text{ for all } i=1,...,n
\]
transitive? reflexive? complete?
Social choice rule
Combines preferences into single weak order \(F(\succeq_1, ..., \succeq_n) = \succeq\)
Completes Pareto order if \(x \succeq^P y\) implies \(x \succeq y\)
Examples
Binary voting
social choice rule is determined by majority vote on each pair \[ x \succeq y \iff x \succeq_i y \text{ for at least $(n+1)/2$
individuals } \]
Examples
Majority voting
Each person votes for most preferred outcome
Social choice rule ranks by number of votes
Ties broken by number of votes for second most preferred, then third, etc
IIA
Independence of irrelevant alternatives if for every \(A \subseteq X\), if \(\{\succeq_i\}_{i=1}^n\) and \(\{\succeq_i'\}_{i=1}^n\) are two sets of individuals preferences that agree on \(A\), \[ x \succeq_i y \iff x \succeq_i' y \; \forall x,y \in A \text{ for each
} i\] then \(\succeq=F(\succeq_1, ..., \succeq_n)\) and \(\succeq'=F(\succeq_1', ..., \succeq_n')\) also agree on \(A\)
Arrow’s impossibility theorem
It is impossible to complete the Pareto order in a way that is not dictatorial and is independent of irrelevant alternatives when \(|X| \geq 4\)
Proof of Arrow’s impossibility theorem
Decisive
With social choice rule \(F\), a group of individuals, \(S \subseteq \{1,\cdots,n\}\) is decisive over \(x, y \in X\) if for any individual preference relations if \(x \succ_i y\) for all \(i \in S\) implies \(x \succ y\), where \(\succ=F(\succ_1,..., \succ_n)\).
Field expansion lemma
Assume \(\exists\)\(x\) and \(y\) such that some group \(S\) is decisive over \(x\), \(y\)
Use IIA to show \(S\) decisive over all other \(z\) and \(w\)
Group contraction lemma
If \(S\) decisive and \(|S| > 1\), then \(\exists S' \subset S\) such that \(S'\) decisive
Cardinality
Bijection
\[ f: A \to B \] is
one-to-one (injective) if for \(b \in B\) there is at most one \(a \in A\) such that \(f(a) = b\)
onto (surjective) if \(\forall b \in B=\)\(\exists a \in A\) s.t. \(f(a) = b\)
bijective if both
Cardinality
Cardinality of \(A\), \(|A|\)
\(|A| = |B|\) if \(\exists\) bijection between \(A\) and \(B\)
Social choice rule