Postcolonialism and Multiculturalism: Between Race and Ethnicity

Sneja Gunew


The relationship between multiculturalism and postcolonialism appears to be an uneasy one. Multiculturalism deals with theories of difference but unlike postcolonialism, which is to a great extent is perceived to be defined by its specific historic legacies in a retroactive way, multiculturalism deals with the management (often compromised) of contemporary geo-political diversity in former imperial centres as well as their ex-colonies alike. It is also increasingly a global discourse since it takes into account the flow of migrants, refugees, diasporas and their relations with nation-states. The reason for continuing to focus on multiculturalism, particularly a critical multiculturalism, is precisely because it is so intimately bound up in many parts of the world with those practices and discourses which manage (often in the sense of police and control) 'diversity'. Within critical theory it has often been an embarrassing term to invoke partly because it is seen as automatically aligned with and hopelessly co-opted by the state in its role of certain kinds of conscious nation - building. As a result, for example, it is consistently rejected by anti-racist groups in Great Britain (Hall, 1995). In the realm of theoretical debate it is often associated with an identity politics based on essentialism and claims for authenticity which automatically reinstate a version of the sovereign subject and a concern with reified notions of origins. Thus it becomes impossible, it seems, to mention multiculturalism and socially progressive critical theory in the same breath. But for all those reasons, because it is a contested term, is exactly why it is crucial to continue to scrutinize the discourses and practices mobilized in the name of multiculturalism.

This chapter will briefly consider some of the different interpretations of multiculturalism in various parts of the world and will then consider the ambiguous function of the key terms 'race' and 'ethnicity' within its deployment. Particular consideration will be given to the republican debates within contemporary Australia with comparisons drawn from Canada, the U. S. and elsewhere.

Multiculturalism means different things in different contexts and in Canada, the U. S. and the U. K. the term is intertwined with questions of racialised differences that have so far not been given sufficient recognition in Australia. While there have always been migrations and disaporas, after two world wars and many other conflicts this century the mix of people within borders increasingly rendered traditional national models anachronistic. Multiculturalism has been developed as a concept by nations and other aspirants to geo-political cohesiveness who are trying to represent themselves as homogeneous in spite of their heterogeneity. For cultural analysts the politics of representation are at its heart while for sociologists the specificities of legislation, public policies and their often arbitrary implementation are the major concern. Multiculturalism may also sometimes be invoked as a way of signaling divergence from a notional mono-culturalism often wrongly identified with the 'West' or 'Europe' and here it overlaps significantly with postcolonial concepts and debates.

Multiculturalism purports to deal with minorities and thus implies a relation with a majority, but how these two categories are defined and wielded in relation to each other is highly contested and further complicated by differences in articulation between advanced capitalist countries and the so-called Third World; between 'settler societies' and, for example, the European community. In general, the organizing factor for the minorities are such terms as 'race', 'ethnicity', and 'indigeneity' while their origins are causally linked to migration, to colonization and other kinds of subjugation. With respect to 'race' it would be more accurate to refer to the processes of racialization involved in representing minorities than to the existence of unproblematic racial categories. 'Ethnicity' as a defining category was initially employed as a differential term to avoid 'race' and its implications of a discredited 'scientific' racism. Ethnicity was more easily attached to the European migrations which proliferated around the two world wars. In North America, phrases such as 'visible minorities' were developed to categorize non-European immigrants who formed part of mass diasporas and neatly encapsulated as well the indigenous groups and those descendants of African slaves who had been an uneasily acknowledged part of the 'nation' for many centuries. Hence multi-culturalism is often perceived as a covert means of indicating racialized differences. The need to deconstruct the 'natural' facade of racialization is clear when one notes that groups such as Ukrainians in Canada and Greeks and Italians in Australia were designated 'black' at various historical stages (Gunew, 1994). Further difficulties encountered by indigenous groups are highlighted in Australia where the Aborigines refuse to be included in multicultural discourses on the grounds that these refer only to cultures of migration, whereas in New Zealand 'biculturalism' is the preferred official term because multiculturalism is seen as a diversion from the Maori sovereignty movement. In Canada First Nations are occasionally included in multicultural discourses and practices and are also consistently trapped between the French-English divide. This has complicated continuing debates on cultural appropriation (Crosby, 1994).

Discussions must also distinguish between state multiculturalism, dealing with the management of diversity, and critical multiculturalism used by minorities as a lever to argue for participation, grounded in their difference, in the public sphere. Minorities use a variety of strategies to overcome the assimilationist presumptions of most state multiculturalism. Crucial to both areas is the notion of 'community' and here women are particularly affected.

State multiculturalism followed 'assimilation' ( a term deriving from digestion and indicating 'becoming the same as') and 'integration' (separatism plus common values) and represents a kind of liberal pluralism which implies both a hidden norm from which minority groups diverge while failing to recognize prevailing power differentials (Goldberg, 1994). State multiculturalism operates most clearly in the discourses and practices of education, sociology, the law and immigration and is always contradictory in its application and assumptions. In educational discourses it is often framed by a liberal pluralism where cultural differences are paraded as a-political ethnic accessories celebrated in multicultural festivals of costumes, cooking and concerts. A recent example of schoolgirls being barred from attending French schools if they wore head scarves has precipitated major debates in which the traditional Left were aligned with the far Right because both identified Islam with religion and bigotry, supposedly at odds with the secular and rationalist republican values constituted by the French nation (Silverman, 1992). In sociology and immigration the 'migrant or minority as problem' is a prevailing trope and emphasis is consistently placed on compatible differences and the need to obey the laws and conform to the mores of the new country. In contrast to supposed Western tolerance the minority is often represented as primitive or uncivilized, importing its social pathologies (such as criminal gangs or 'uncivilized practices' such as arranged marriages or clitoridectomy).

The 'community' becomes the representative of and reference point for cultural difference and within this women, for example, rarely have agency. In the exceptional instances where they do, for example in the women's movement, other internal differences, such as class loyalties, are suppressed (Ali, 1992). In a diasporic situation minorities are characterized externally as static and a-historical (Anthias and Yuval-Davis, 1992) and internally often suffer from compensatory nostalgias which can lead to rather rigid constructions of and adherence to purported traditions, particularly when associated with the struggle for maintenance of religious beliefs. Women in these situations are often designated the bearers of these traditions without having agency in terms either of their interpretation or as community leaders (Saghal, 1992). A particularly telling example was provided by the Shahbano case in India where a 73-year-old Muslim woman was awarded maintenance by the High Court of India after a ten-year battle. This in turn led to accusations by the Muslim minority that their rights under the Muslim Shariat law (personal laws governing the family within a religious framework) were being undermined by the Hindu majority. Shahbano herself rejected the decision in what was interpreted as an act of Muslim solidarity. As Pathak and Rajan point out, such apparent respect for minority rights repeatedly trap women between the private and the public spheres, in this case, the family and the state (Pathak and Rajan, 1992). Clearly the legal contradictions in and limits to multicultural policies exist in all contexts. It remains to be seen how the European Community will legislate to deal both with minorities within their separate nations and with the differences between the various European nations.

Even within supposedly more enlightened contexts such as universities or academic feminism one encounters the phenomenon of the token 'woman of colour' invited to conferences (Trinh, 1989; Chow, 1994) or equally tokenistic cross-cultural work which repeatedly uncovers the usual round of stereotypes (Nnaemeka, 1994). There is also the problem of conflating minorities in terms such as 'women of colour' or 'visible minorities' which once again serves to reinforce the notion of a legislative centre or norm (Bannerji, 1993).

Multiculturalism's implied focus on culture can also occlude or minimize specific political activisms and their histories. Hazel Carby (1992) has noted that literary/cultural emphasis on black women's texts functions as a substitute for actual social relations or the continuing work of desegregation and anti-racism.

However, even these complicit practices have become the target of what are known as the 'PC' (Political Correctness) debates. Following multicultural policies and programs, including such tactics as affirmative action, a number of conservative commentators have referred to the reign of the 'thought police' and 'biopolitics' (Fekete, 1994). The latter is a reference to the further issue of identity politics -- that in the name of political agency people are identified with and reduced to their supposed sex, race or ethnicity. As Ella Shohat and Robert Stam state wryly (1994), 'theory deconstructs totalizing myths while activism nourishes them'. This formulation can lead both to backlash from the wider community and to minorities competing with each other and building hierarchies of legitimation based on oppression.

While Canada has to some degree pioneered the concept as part of state policy in dealing with minorities, there is a current plethora of studies focusing on multiculturalism in the U.S. and while it is clear that racialised differences are at the heart of these debates there has been an interesting historical shift in the wake of the demise of the Cold War. As Rajeswari Mohan puts it:

In its incarnation in the 1980s, multiculturalism was a code word for "race', yoked to signifiers that included "affirmative action" and "quotas", among others. Since the 1992 controversy over New York City's rainbow curriculum, the term has become a code word for lesbian and gay issues. Despite shifts in the ideological freight carried by the term, what remains constant is its connotation of "special interest" that supposedly weighs against an implied general interest.' (Mohan, 1995: 374)

The notion that multiculturalism could be coded to register a variety of oppositional minority positions is also taken up by George Yúdice (1995) in relation to Jewishness. The reference point for all these is a consolidated and hegemonic 'whiteness' as the sign for all forms of socio-economic and political privilege.

While multiculturalism is now often perceived as an empty signifier onto which groups project their fears and hopes, the future for critical multiculturalism lies in an alertness to the inherent 'hybridity' and diverse affiliations of all subjects which may be mobilized in varying combinations by particular projects or events. Coalitions may be built around 'mutual and reciprocal relativization' (Shohat and Stam, 1994). Critical multiculturalism may still be usefully invoked to counter exclusionary hegemonic practices or appeals to nostalgic histories in a bid to return to 'basics' and the reinstatement of the conservative status quo suggested by such recent examples as the threat to abolish affirmative action policies in the U.S. and in Canada.

Multiculturalism in Australia is too often ignored as a significant factor in the proliferating work in cultural studies or as part of socially progressive critical theory. The Republican debates in Australia include numerous dismissive references to so-called 'multicultural orthodoxies' (Docker, 1994; Curthoys & Muecke, 1993) which are glossed as representing a position in which the history of Australia's diverse migrations is forgotten in an attempt to construct a hegemonic and homogenized Anglo-Celtic centre instead of as an attempt to stress that everyone participates in ethnicity. One could argue against this that the references to 'Anglo-Celts' in the work of multicultural theorists (Gunew and Longley, 1992) are not simply concerned with depicting historical continuities but are often attempts to highlight a language of representation dealing with inclusions and exclusion in the narratives of the nation. In other words, who is included in those various narratives of Australia's cultural traditions or other collective histories? The history of Australian immigration has been a very diverse one over two centuries but these nuances are not foregrounded when various compilations attempt to depict/characterize the nation. Of particular concern are the ways we are enmeshed in and positioned by discourses of nationalism with all their contradictions, tensions and exclusions. The Australian caricatures of multicultural critical theory recall a timely warning contained in Paul Gilroy's recent study Black Atlantic in which he mentions, in the British context, 'a quiet cultural nationalism which pervades the work of some radical thinkers' (Gilroy, 1993:4) who prefer not to deal with the influences of forces (such as non Anglo-Celtic nationals and their concerns) they consider to be outside the national borders. The various incarnations of radical nationalisms in Australia could also be perceived at times as falling into these conceptual traps.

Australian usages of multiculturalism tend not to signal articulations of racialised differences and this may in part be because the category represented by race is often predominantly reserved for the Aboriginal peoples who in the Australian context (unlike indigenous peoples in North America) have succeeded in dissociating their concerns from discourses of multiculturalism. But these obvious ways may be deceptive for I would argue that by privileging 'ethnicity' as an organizing term Australian discourses of multiculturalism represent the erasure or evasion of race (race being used here in the sense of racialised groups, conceptions and forms of power). The racial other is a shifting concept but this aspect is not foregrounded in the current focus on depicting the category exclusively in terms of the indigenous peoples. As Ien Ang and Jon Stratton have argued, in Australia ' the category of race should be seen as the symbolic marker of unabsorbable cultural difference' (Stratton & Ang, 1994:155).

For example, a dominant rhetorical pattern in the debates surrounding Australian republicanism suggests that Australia is borrowing to some degree from New Zealand in that it appears increasingly to be embracing a kind of politics of biculturalism. The brave new republic is renarrativised on the basis of reconciliation with the indigenous peoples and while this is admirable in itself, it is interesting that this process is framed in terms of a binary opposition which homogenizes both sides and leaves little room for their internal differences much less for other locations of difference. For example, a recent collection titled Being Whitefella (Graham, 1994), modeled on New Zealander Michael King's famous anthology Pakeha attempts to scrutinize and deconstruct the norm of whiteness or Europeanness. This represents a timely move in line with comparable directions elsewhere (Young, 1990; Frankenberg, 1993; Morrison, 1992; Ware, 1992) but in Australia these efforts once again appear to consolidate Australianness as synonymous with Anglo-Celticism, albeit without acknowledging this. For example, here is a comment from the introduction: 'Ireland and having an Irish ancestry, feature in the backgrounds of other contributors ... Perhaps because the Irish understand oppression, love the land and know what it's like to live on the fringe. Booker Prize winning author Roddy Doyle commented that the Irish are the blacks of Europe. A number of prominent Aboriginal people have also noticed the shared experience.' (Graham, 1994:23). It is clear from this who is being constructed here as part of what the back cover describes as 'non-indigenous Australians'. We are confronted with 'blacks' versus 'whites' in the familiar contexts which derive from the scientific racism of an earlier period. Where does that leave 'ethnicity', the code name given for those more recent immigrant settlers who don't conveniently derive from Britain or Ireland and who interrogate these neat categories? And where does that leave Aboriginality for that matter, aspects of which can arguably also be constructed in terms of ethnicity? Aboriginality is also a matter of intersubjective relations as Marcia Langton notes,

' " Aboriginality", therefore, is a field of intersubjectivity in that it is remade over and over again in a process of dialogue, of imagination, of representation and interpretation. Both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people create "Aboriginalities" ...' (Langton, 1993:33-4).

But let us return to those hidden reference points (hidden in the new republicanism which seems currently to be organizing the discourses of the nation in Australia), that is, race, ethnicity and diaspora.

As a recent plethora of books suggests, the distinction between race and ethnicity is increasingly a blurred one (Anthias and Yuval-Davis, 1992; Frankenberg 1993; Goldberg 1990, 1993; Morrison,1992; West, 1993). Both are, it seems, invented in ways that accord with the particular traditions they are asked to shore up. It becomes a matter of historical specificity in relation to particular groups as to where they have been placed on those axes of nationalism or internationalism which contextualize both race and ethnicity. In an earlier era ethnicity was seen as a way of circumventing the racist history of 'race' and was associated with choice, in other words that one could choose the groups to which one belonged and within them could also choose what to preserve as part of an imagined past. Ethnicity was also largely conceived in cultural terms as a matter of the rituals of daily life, including language and religion, where culture supposedly operated as a place distinct from the political, a kind of safe haven from its exigencies.

Race on the other hand has been associated with irreducible difference (akin to sexual difference) often located in what have been termed 'visible differences' (for example, skin colour) which gained their legitimation through associations with so-called biological givens. This meant that choice was suspended in the face of racist projections emerging in response to some aspects of these arbitrarily chosen visible differences. It also means that visible differences often amount to a coded way of referring back to those apparent biological essences which formed the grounds for scientific racism. While concepts of irreducible differences can be said to work in two directions by conferring legitimacy on both racism, on the one hand, and on attempts to forge radical communities which subvert those agendas, modern theorists have increasingly undermined the bases for arguing for race as predicated on absolute differences. As David Goldberg puts it in his recent study, ' race is arbitrary ... were one to line up all the individual members of the human species according to any usual racial criteria like pigmentation, there are no non arbitrary points at which one might draw the lines of racial distinctions' (Goldberg, 1993: 83). Models attempting to locate the absolute grounds of racial difference have been displaced by analyses establishing the mechanisms of racism and racialised forms of power which result in certain groups gaining 'race privilege' (Frankenberg 1993). As Goldberg states, 'Race is irrelevant, but all is race' (Goldberg, 1993:6), that is, irrelevant because while there are no non arbitrary or absolute markers of race, 'debates about and struggles around race in a variety of societies are really about the meaning and nature of political constitution and community: Who counts as in and who out, who is central to the body politic and who peripheral, who is autonomous and who dependent?' (Goldberg, 1993:83). Another way of putting it is to see it in this period of history as a struggle over who controls the codes and practices of nation-building.

Constructions of nationalism are traditionally predicated on formulating both cohesiveness within the borders of the nation and on instituting absolute differences from adjoining states so they borrow their structures from and indeed incorporate concepts pertaining to racialised differences. (Goldberg, 1993:4). Therefore it is much easier to stage a national history, founded on Ernest Renan's 'moments of forgetting' (Renan 1990:11), in terms of a cohesive indigenous peoples displaced by equally cohesive colonizing powers. In the event, those other groups with their different legacies who settled and displaced the country and its inhabitants are left out of the drama, particularly when they are associated with another supposed 'race' such as 'Asians' are deemed to be. Where are the histories and analyses of first contact with those many non-Anglo-Celtic settler others? While the European immigrants could (with some effort and strain perhaps) be amalgamated to the Anglo-Celts or Whites it proved rather more difficult to do this with the Asians. In other words while there is no 'natural' logic which orders racialised discourse it is made to appear as though there were.

If one were to attempt to continue to differentiate race and ethnicity it could be suggested that while race is structured by the desire to be considered human, ethnicity is structured by a concomitant desire for citizenship, that is, to be a legitimate part of political structures. This does not constitute an absolute difference but one of emphasis. It has also been argued by Goldberg that racial differences are in fact determined by ethnic choices, that is, that the arbitrary markers by means of which race is constructed are based on ethnic choices, whether this be religion, skin colour or the wearing of headgear. As he puts it,' invoking the concept of race is invariably ethnocentric. Ethnicity is the mode of cultural identification and distinction... assigning significance to biological or physical attributes...[it] is a cultural choice.' (Goldberg, 1993:74-5). This is illustrated for example in Myrna Tonkinson's contribution to the collection mentioned earlier Being Whitefella. Tonkinson, an anthropologist involved in Aboriginal land claims, hails from Jamaica via America and describes herself as of Afro-Caribbean origin (Graham, 1994:162) . Presumably, after years of living as a black in a highly racialised society she finds herself in the interesting position of being designated 'white' by the Aborigines she encounters who clearly displace the supposedly 'natural' markers of skincolour for those designating 'race privilege'. By making Tonkinson an honorary white the Aborigines, according to Goldberg's analysis, have exercised the kind of ethnic choice which traditionally, but invisibly, structures discourses of race.

Turning now to another example of the processes which choreograph the relations between race and ethnicity, in Canada recently there has been considerable controversy about whether or not the 'Legion' clubs of returned soldiers would allow Sikhs wearing turbans to enter their sacred precincts where the dominant activity seems to be the very secular one of consuming alcohol and where the Anglo-Celtic convention that men should remove their headgear prevailed (Smyth, 1994). One presumes the Sikhs were less interested in alcoholic rites than in fighting for the right to enter these clubs, to be included in this nationally-important community. In the midst of this it was revealed that Canadian-Jewish veterans, to preserve the right to wear the yarmulke, had discreetly formed a separate chapter and that this 'choice' was of course open to the Sikhs, indeed, they were strongly encouraged to exercise it. Television screens bristled with elderly balding men who became increasingly red-faced (no doubt the results of years of attendance at their local club) as they argued that it had nothing to do with race and everything to do with 'respect' and equally elderly men in turbans who (with far more equanimity) argued the same as a way of achieving the opposite. The controversy was organized around a rhetoric of 'respect' both for the war dead and for the dominant cultural conventions of a country into which one was being 'assimilated' (marked culturally by not wearing headgear in hegemonic European-Canadian culture and the opposite in a branch of Asian-Canadian culture). Thus the logic appeared to be governed by ethnic choices rather than racism. However no-one was really fooled.

The example illustrates once more that we are dealing with who belongs to the nation and who doesn't and that this may be organized around quite arbitrary markers. Ironically this dispute took place in the midst of commemorative D-Day celebrations thus producing a spate of letters in the newspaper asking in bewilderment how this could happen in the face of a war in which the forces of enlightenment and tolerance had won, after all, over the forces of intolerance. This was set in the context of a recurrent and heated nationalist discourse surrounding the question of whether or not Quebec would finally separate from Canada. It may well be that the debate around soldiers and headgear was in fact a diversionary tactic or displaced symptom produced by the heightened emotions surrounding the possibilities of Quebec's imminent secession but the fact remains that Canadian nationalism (like any other) is finding it difficult to sustain the protocols of nationalist discourse which attempt to maintain, as Homi Bhabha has argued, the ambivalent task of representing the-people-as-one (Bhabha 1990: 291-322).

Diaspora is the term which hinges, rather than mediates, those oppositions of race and ethnicity. It is undeniable that questions of diaspora, particularly in the face of current European upheavals, are seen as threats to notions of the cohesive nation. Diasporic allegiances along the race /ethnicity vector breach the homogeneity of the nation state with other affiliations, of increasing importance in the new structures of globalisation. To some extent this movement of global connections is also happening amongst the indigenous peoples who are forming alliances across those nation-states imposed on them as a way of confirming solidarity for claims often grounded in land rights. Here the desire to be human runs hand in hand with the desire for citizenship but in this case that desire for citizenship may need to involve the setting up alternate models of the nation. As Goldberg's and Gilroy's studies illustrate, both impulses are regulated by a desire for supposedly natural and continuous structures of belonging (family, community, nation) in the face of modernist discourses of anonymity. Indeed, modernity, the constituting of Europeanness both as evolved civilization and as civilizing imperialism with reason and its attendant legitimations at its core, is put in question by issues relating to diasporas and their histories. As Gilroy cogently argues, 'Defenders and critics of modernity seem to be equally unconcerned that the history and expressive culture of the African diaspora, the practice of racial slavery, or the narratives of imperial conquest may require all simple periodisations of the modern and the postmodern to be drastically rethought.' (42)

Thus we are faced continually with the challenge of diaspora -- in what senses and at what moments do we acknowledge the ties of diaspora? How do those terms signify? How do we define these scatterings and dispersions and what remains? These are questions which are only beginning to resonate, particularly in the wake of the restructuring of Africa, the former Soviet Republic and Europe.

But let us return for the moment to ethnicity and race. In an earlier era, dominated by critics such as Werner Sollors in the U.S., ethnicity was perceived as shaping the discourses of consent rather than those of descent (relating to race in the model of genealogy) which were seen as structuring an earlier period of narratives of nationalism. It amounted to the desire to be a citizen in one's differences which, being based on a choice of the rituals one wished to continue, tended to work towards avoiding those anxieties provoked by cultural difference in the sense of fragmentation and dispersal. Ethnicity was of course not able to deal with the characteristics pertaining to visible minorities, in other words, only functioned as an organizing rhetoric for a predominantly European settler population. This 'whiteness', as Toni Morrison has eloquently demonstrated in her recent book Playing in the Dark, was never able to deal consciously, for example, with Afro-American differences. The more recent era which attempted to establish multiculturalism as a token acknowledgment of these other differences also strenuously side-stepped a recognition of power differentials amongst competing minority groups (a recognition significantly absent in the recent PC backlash). Thus a profoundly conservative pluralist model of state multiculturalism has currency in the U.S., Canada and Australia.

While 'race' has no basis in fact racism does. Thus analyses of race have attempted to distinguish themselves from the scientific racism prevailing last century which in turn, according to analysts such as Gilroy and Goldberg, have served to structure both nationalism and modernity. As part of this analysis Goldberg argues that far from being inherently irrational, 'Racist exclusions throughout modernity can and have been rationally ordered and legitimated' (Goldberg, 1993:11) and indeed, that racism structures the Enlightenment legacy of the 'man of reason'. Therefore the notion that racism is irrational, that it falls outside the mechanisms of reason, is put in question. The fact that racism is indeed 'reasonable' returns agency to individuals who are therefore once again made responsible, at least to some degree, for their racist actions. Prevailing models analyzing systemic and discursive racism have tended to remove the emphasis from individual responsibility and Goldberg suggests that there needs to be a corrective to this trend. Similarly, Ruth Frankenberg's analysis , based on numerous interviews, in White Woman, Race Matters, also argues that responsibility for certain racist actions must be maintained in what she designates as the three areas of racism: essentialist racism, color- and power-evasiveness and race cognizant reassertions (Frankenberg, 1993:140).

In these models of inclusion and exclusion one notes that constructions of both race and ethnicity have the following features: they are structured in relation to an economy or logic of the 'natural' linking family, community and the nation, in other words, maintaining the apparent homology and cohesiveness of such 'natural' ties. While all are discrete they are also seen as leaking into each other. In relation to this point, Gilroy's critique of the essentialist nature of American Afrocentricity shows how 'the trope of the family which is such a recurrent feature of their discourse is itself a characteristically American means for comprehending the limits and dynamics of racial community' (Gilroy, 1993:191). Meanwhile Ruth Frankenberg's chapter on 'interracial' marriages, clearly reveals how these supposed continuities and homologies are in fact structured in terms of irreconcilable contradictions. The family of the nation is clearly at odds with the nation of families.

Such figurative logic also informs (albeit in idiosyncratic ways) a news item referring to the Bosnian war (Toronto Globe & Mail 1994). It was reported that a United Nations panel had found that Bosnian Serbs had pursued 'an overriding policy of advocating the use of rape as a method of "ethnic cleansing" against Bosnian Muslims'. How might one unpack the signification of 'ethnic cleansing' here? One surmises from the many reports that 'ethnic cleansing' is powered by the desire to align groups conceived as ethnically absolute or homogeneous with particular territories. In this instance, how those ethnic groups are chosen seems based predominantly on religion rather than 'blood ties' since there has been considerable genealogical intermingling amongst the peoples of this area and presumably language (another of the privileged markers of ethnic difference) is not as clear-cut an issue as religion. Religion, embedded in history, dates back to the Turkish conquest of 1389 at Kosovo which is one of the rallying historical moments for Bosnian Serbs (Kostash, 1993). Thus Muslim victims now are refigured in terms of Muslim aggressors then. Ethnic absolutism is therefore not constructed in the expected racist model of the racially pure family (in the sense of bloodlines) otherwise how would one offer the logic of rape as a means of ethnic cleansing? Rape, a violent genealogical intervention in many imperialisms (including of course Afro-American ones) here interrupts a symbolically pure genealogy on both sides. It is constructed in this case, however, not as genealogical contamination but as blasphemy if religious difference is the prime referent for each group. Thus the bodies of Muslim Serbian women are figured as the reliquary of the 'ethnically homogeneous' family and, coherent with this figurative logic, as the sanctuary of the Muslim faith.

When Michael Ignatieff concluded his series of television programs Blood and Belonging which examined various nationalist trouble spots (including the Kurds, Quebec, Northern Ireland, Germany, the Ukraine and 'Yugoslavia'), he stated that there were two concepts of nation: the ethnic one (for 'us' only) and the civic one (an alliance based on consent rather than descent). In the example above, the publicly witnessed withholding of consent (the accounts suggest the women and girls were deliberately and repeatedly raped in front of their families) means that we are dealing with the 'ethnic' nation here. Genealogically speaking, the rapes ensure that there will be continuity between the 'them' and 'us' in the future. In other words, Ignatieff's ethnic model of the nation is perpetuated into a bloody future of continued ethnically - based contention. There appears to be no room for civic consent here. Blood (in the sense of genealogy and religion) underwrites belonging in the sense of legitimating territorial aspirations. The future bloodlines injected into these bodies, as genealogy and blasphemy, establishes the corporeal continuum of a past dating from presumed comparable actions by the Muslim Turks in 1389. One assumes that this over-determined chronology serves to justify the atrocities of the present war. The absolutism projected onto ethnicity in this scenario matches the absolutism associated with race in a previous age. The mechanisms relating to both race and ethnicity are used interchangeably in this new rhetoric of constituting and managing the nation.

David Goldberg suggests that 'if we see race as a fluid, fragile, and more or less vacuous concept capable of alternative senses', then instead of talking in terms of theories of race, as though 'race' were a given: 'We will take them alternatively as transformed and historically transforming conceptions of race, subjective identity, and social identification.' (Goldberg, 1993:80-1) Race, as he points out, naturalizes 'the groupings it identifies in its own name' (Goldberg, 1993:81) including those pertaining to the nation. As we know from studies in nationalism, notably Benedict Anderson's (1991) work, the assumed natural and primordial homogeneity of the nation is actually the result of much labour to cover over the differences and disparate elements. It can take as given neither language, genealogy nor territory and is instead sutured by specific rhetorical structures of icons and symbols which construct notions of both borders and belonging.

To what extent can cultural critics analyze the models of culture emerging from these deployments of race and ethnicity? Culture, as we've observed in these debates, too often represents a retreat from the political and clearly this is one element to bring to crisis. A prevailing trend in these debates is that of self-consciously employing a differently situated perspective to deconstruct the dominant, indeed to show whether and how there is such an object as the dominant in representation, in a variety of discourses. For example, Ruth Frankenberg suggests how: 'To speak of whiteness is to assign everyone a place in the relations of racism. It is to emphasize that dealing with racism is not merely an option for white people...' (Frankenberg, 1993:6). And later, in an interesting echo of Marcia Langton's statement quoted earlier, ' "whiteness" is indeed a space defined only by reference to those named cultures it has flung out to the perimeter. Whiteness is in this sense fundamentally a relational category' (Frankenberg, 1993:231). In other words, it is the 'white gaze' which we can usefully define (Frankenberg, 1993:18) at this point. And, like blackness, whiteness is a shifting term as we have seen in the case of Tonkinson. Indeed, a Canadian example was precipitated by the recent 'Writing Through Race' controversy when Myrna Kostash made the following pronouncements in the Globe & Mail:

In 1908, Ukrainians were not white. Two generations later we are. How can this be? For one thing we learned to speak English. My parents, born in Canada, acquired the status of loyal British subjects -- honorary whiteness, if you like. By the time I was in school in the 1950s and 1960s, Ukrainian Canadians had become part of the Canadian "mosaic", colourful nuggets decorating the two "founding nations". (Kostash, 1994)

Appeals to the facts of a nation's history are not really at issue here, since we are dealing rather with metaphors and signifying systems mobilized as part of a rhetoric of the national culture concerned with identifying insiders and outsiders.

In relation to teasing out the salient features of minority perspectives, the founding study for the construction of alterity is of course Said's Orientalism. Its later and local applications are many but Toni Morrison's study is an outstanding recent example. Morrison's organizing question is: 'how is "literary whiteness" and "literary blackness" made, and what is the consequence of this construction?' (Morrison, 1992:xii) She then goes on the examine the creation of 'Africanism' (an invented Africa) in American literature and finds, for example, that early American writing is 'in large measure shaped by the presence of the racial other'(Morrison, 1992:46). In the U.S. increasing scholarly work around the construction of 'Asianness' is gathering pace: the work of Shirley Geok-lin Lim (1993), Rey Chow (1991;1993) and a whole new generation of critics, often drawing upon their own personal histories of being Asian- American (Hagedorn, 1993; Wong,1993; Cheung,1993). In Australia such work serves as a useful corrective to the over-simplified biculturalist oppositions mentioned earlier, for example, Suvendrini Perera's essay analyzing the mechanisms of representation in which Asia and the Balkans are allied in a new model of 'absolutist politics and oriental despotism' (Perera 1994: 13). As she puts it:

This ... is the work yet to be done by a cultural theory interested in Australian-Asian relations; it calls, not simply for the cataloguing of mutual representations by Australians and various individual Asian nations, nor for the adjudication of these representations as good or bad, but for a theorizing of the complex, often untranslatable and unequal interactions involved in the business of dealing with and dealing in dominant cultures. (Perera 1994: 20)

Homi Bhabha's highly influential work is particularly relevant in attempts to think about borders and hybridity. In a recent essay he defines 'hybridity' as: ' the construction of cultural authority within conditions of political antagonism or inequity. Strategies of hybridization reveal an estranging movement in the "authoritative", even authoritarian inscription of the sign.' (Bhabha, 1993:212) We should also note that there is a suggestion in some recent criticism, based on classic deconstruction, that such analyses in the name of hybridity are dependent on the very boundaries they seek to cross or blur (Jagose, 1993). Such formalist dangers bedevil any counter-discourse, hence the intellectual purchase of theories such as Judith Butler's notion of performativity which constructs the subversive in terms of repetitive stagings. One thinks also of Paul Gilroy's brilliant study of jazz as the detailed workings of a hybrid culture flowing in two directions of mutually beneficial 'contamination' in Black Atlantic.

Where does this leave multicultural critical theory? For one thing it remains a useful discourse adjacent to and partly overlapping with postcolonial theory in particular. While postcolonialism is sometimes defined as studies in Eurocentrism it should not be confined to this and one has to be alert to its usage and claims in specific instances. As Arif Dirlik (1994) has pointed out in a recent article there are problems with its deployment as being both too general and too particular: too general when used by First World thinkers 'who apply concepts of First World derivation globally without giving a second thought to the social differences that must qualify those concepts historically and contextually' (340) and too specific when non-First World intellectuals generalize from the local to the global. As Dirlik points out there is ' a contradiction between an insistence on heterogeneity, difference, and historicity and a tendency to generalize from the local to the global while denying that there are global forces at work that may condition the local in the first place.' (341)

In relation to this critique, multicultural critical theory can serve to remind one of both the local and the global in that it introduces minority perspectives as well as suggesting diasporic networks. It continues to be a way of situating subjectivities outside certain nationalist investments and hence may be used as a way of paying attention to minority perspectives, using them to critique dominant discourses and practices. There seems some truth in Ruth Frankenberg's suggestion that minorities see the elements which structure the dominant more clearly than do those at the 'centre' (Frankenberg, 1993:5; 206). At the same time there is also always the caution that minority perspectives are neither free of their own investments nor do they automatically retain a hold on some kind of privileged moral capital. For example, in relation to the question of ethnicity it is interesting to note that Frankenberg's analysis shows her subjects signifying their cultural belonging in terms of 'heirlooms' or annual celebrations of certain genealogies. This brings to mind the Australian-Vietnamese writer Uyen Loewald's (1994: 78-81) characteristically sharp designation of ethnic groups in Australia as comprising a 'museum culture' relevant to the cultural tourism industry rather than to themselves as part of a struggle for gaining political legitimacy in their differences. This version of or complicity with a type of all too prevalent construction of ethnicity is hardly radical in either a cultural or socio-political sense and serves merely to reinforce dominant structures which always perceive the minority as consigned to a past which is rich and diverse but always safely in the past (Anderson, 1991). In ways that we've traced in relation to race and ethnicity, multiculturalism is now, according to Bhabha (1993), a kind of floating signifier which gains both meaning and strategic capabilities only in a specific context. It can be used by any faction and has no privileged or unchanging meaning.

These decentred perspectives can also be used to demonstrate the ways in which certain discursive traditions haunt the new, for example, the new racism referred to by Goldberg and Gilroy or the continuing covert racism hiding at the heart of modernity and at the heart of liberalism (Frankenberg). This in turn may lead to the refiguring and rehistoricising of modernity and the various 'posts' that follow, including postmodernism and postcolonialism.

In the Australian context there are the thoughtful reminders promulgated by Wayne Hudson and David Carter in the introduction to their anthology on the republican debates:

Often the history of Australian Republicanism is narrated as if it were a purely English-Irish drama. Such narration tends to ignore the ethnic diversity of the peoples living in this country and the diverse republican traditions of which many have had direct or indirect experience. (Hudson & Carter, 1993:7)

However one notes as well Gassan Hage's equally thoughtful and thought-provoking analysis of these debates which reveal them to serve the interests of an Anglo-Celtic hegemony, in spite of their use of an inclusivist rhetoric of multicultural tolerance. In the details he examines of the workings of the multicultural spectacle of the nation, the organizing tropes derive from the classificatory systems of collections and zoology which ' belong to a long Western colonialist tradition of exhibiting the national self through the exhibiting of otherness.' (Hage, 1993: 123)

Once again we return to the question of belonging and note that these interrogations of the national emerge from both local communities and global diasporas. They can have outcomes as murderous as those of the old nationalisms but at the same time a retreat into nostalgias for some putative lost coherence of the nation does not appear to be an answer. Nor does the imposition of binary oppositions which trivialize the interactions of complex and non-homogeneous groups and reduces them to' black and white' seem to be the solution. The way ahead in terms of analyzing cultural texts of any kind seems to be to denaturalize the classificatory categories invoked to stabilize and legitimate all types of nation-building and here the constellation of terms: multiculturalism, ethnicity, race, postcolonialism all have their shifting and shifty roles to play.




Ali, Yasmin (1992) 'Muslim Women and the Politics of Ethnicity and Culture in Northern England', in Gita Saghal and Nira Yuval-Davis (eds), Refusing Holy Orders: Women and Fundamentalism in Britain, London: Virago Press, pp.101-123.

Anderson, Ben (1991) Imagined Communities, Verso: London

Anthias, Floya and Nira Yuval-Davis (1992) Racialized Boundaries: Race, Nation, Gender, Colour and Class and the Anti-Racist Struggle, London: Routledge.

Bannerji, Himani (1993) 'Popular Images of South Asian Women', in Himani Bannerji (ed) Returning the Gaze: Essays on Racism, Feminism and Politics, Toronto: Sister Vision Press, pp.144-152.

Bhabha, Homi (1990) 'DissemiNation: Time, narrative, and the margins of the modern nation', Nation and Narration, ed. H.Bhabha, Routledge: London, 291-322

------ (1993) 'Culture's In Between', Artforum (September), 167-214

------ (1994) The Location of Culture, Routledge: London

Butler, Judith (1993) Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of "Sex", Routledge: NY

Carby, Hazel (1992) 'The Multicultural Wars', in Gina Dent (ed), Black Popular Culture, Bay Press: Seattle, pp.187-199.

Cheung, King-Kok (1993) Articulate Silences, Cornell University Press: Ithaca

Chow, Rey (1991) Woman and Chinese Modernity: The Politics of Reading Between East and West, University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota

------ (1993) Writing Diaspora: Tactics of Intervention in Contemporary Cultural Studies, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Crosby, Marcia (1994) 'Construction of the Imaginary Indian', in Wendy Waring (ed) By, For and About: Feminist Cultural Politics, Toronto: Women's Press, pp.85-113.

Curthoys, Ann & Muecke, Stephen (1993) 'Australia, for Example', The Republicanism Debate, ed. W.Hudson & D.Carter, New South Wales University Press: Sydney, 177-200

Dabydeen, Cyril (1994) 'Celebrating Difference', Books in Canada (September), 23-25

Dirlik, Arif (1994) 'The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism', Critical Inquiry (Winter) 20, 328-356

Docker, John (1994) 'Post Nationalism', Arena Magazine (Feb.-March), 40, 3-4

Fekete, John (1994) Moral Panic: Biopolitics Rising, Robert Davies Publishing: Montreal-Toronto

Frankenberg, Ruth (1993) White Woman, Race Matters: The Social Construction of Whiteness, University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis

Gilroy, Paul (1993) The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness, Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass.

Globe & Mail (1994) 'Rape Routine in Ethnic Cleansing', June 3, p. A.6

Goldberg, David T. ed. (1990) Anatomy of Racism, University of Minnesota Press: Minn.

------ (1993) Racist Culture: Philosophy and the Politics of Meaning, Blackwell : Oxford

------ (1994) 'Introduction: Multicultural Conditions', in David T. Goldberg (ed) Multiculturalism: A Critical Reader, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1-41.

Graham, Duncan ed. (1994) Being Whitefella, Fremantle Arts Centre Press: Fremantle, W.A.

Gunew, S. & K.Longley eds. (1992) Striking Chords: Multicultural Literary Interpretations, Allen & Unwin: Sydney

Gunew, Sneja (1994) Framing Marginality: Multicultural Literary Studies, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

------ (1994a) 'Multicultural Multiplicities: U.S., Canada, Australia', Cultural Studies: Pluralism and Theory, ed. D.Bennett, Melbourne University Press: Melbourne, 51-65

Hage, Ghassan (1993)'Republicanism, Multiculturalism, Zoology', Communal Plural, 2, 113-137

Hagedorn, Jessica ed. (1993) Charlie Chan is Dead: An Anthology of Contemporary Asian American Fiction, Penguin: NY

Hall, Stuart (1995) 'New Ethnicities', The Post-Colonial Studies Reader, ed. Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths & Helen Tiffin, Routledge: NY, 223-227

Hudson, Wayne & Carter, David eds. (1993) ' Reframing the Issues', The Republicanism Debate, New South Wales University Press: Sydney, 2-35

Ignatieff, Michael (1994) Blood and Belonging, Penguin (Canada): Toronto

Jagose, Annamarie (1993) 'Slash and Suture: Post/colonialism in 'Borderland/LaFrontera: The New Mestiza', Feminism and the Politics of Difference, ed. S.Gunew & A.Yeatman, Allen & Unwin: Sydney, 212-227

King, Michael ed. (1991) Pakeha, Penguin (NZ): Auckland

Kostash, Myrna (1993) Bloodlines: A Journey in Eastern Europe, Douglas & McIntyre: Vancouver, Toronto

------ (1994) 'You check your colour at the door', Globe & Mail, May 9, p. A19

Langton, Marcia (1993) 'Well, I heard it on the radio and I saw it on television...', Australian Film Commission: Sydney

Lim, Shirley Geok-Lin (1993) Nationalism and Literature: English- Language Writing from the Philippines and Singapore, New Day Publishers, Quezon City

Loewald, Uyen (1994) 'Feminism and Colonialism', Australia for Women: Travel and Culture, ed. S.Hawthorne & R.Klein, Spinifex Press: Melbourne

Lyotard, Jean-François (1986) 'Defining the Postmodern', Postmodernism, ed. L.Appignanesi, Institute for Contemporary Art: London

Miki, Roy (1994) 'From Exclusion to Inclusion', Canadian Forum (September), 5-8

Mohan, Rajeswari (1995) 'Multiculturalism in the Nineties: Pitfalls and Possibilities', After Political Correctness: The Humanities and Society in the 1990s, ed. Christopher Newfield & Ronald Strickland, Westview Press: Boulder, pp.372-388.

Morrison, Toni (1992) Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination, Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass.

Nnaemeka, Obioma (1994) ' Bringing African Women into the Classroom: Rethinking Pedagogy and Epistemology', in Margaret R. Higonnet (ed) Borderwork: Feminist Engagements with Comparative Literature, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 301-318.

Pathak, Zakia and Rajeswari Sunder Rajan (1992) ' "Shahbano" ' , in Judith Butler and Joan W. Scott (eds), Feminists Theorize the Political, New York: Routledge, pp. 257-279.

Perera, Suvendrini (1994) 'Recalcitrant Subalterns (and Other Multicultural Monsters), unpublished paper delivered at the University of Hong Kong

Renan, Ernest (1990) 'What is a Nation?', Nation and Narration, ed. H.Bhabha, Routledge: London, 8-22

Ross, Becki (1995) The House That Jill Built: A Lesbian Nation in Formation, University of Toronto Press: Toronto

Saghal, Gita (1992) 'Secular Spaces: The Experience of Asian Women Organizing', in Gita Saghal and Nira Yuval-Davis (eds), Refusing Holy Orders: Women and Fundamentalism in Britain, London: Virago Press, pp.163-197.

Said, Edward (1993) Culture and Imperialism Chatto & Windus: London

Sharpe, Jenny (1993) Allegories of Empire: The Figure of Woman in the Colonial Text, University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis

Shohat, Ella and Robert Stam (1994) Unthinking Eurocentrism: Multiculturalism and the Media, London: Routledge.

Silverman, Max (1992) Deconstructing the Nation: Immigration, Racism and Citizenship in Modern France, London: Routledge.

Smyth, Julie (1994) 'Sikh group to fight Legion headgear ban', Globe & Mail, June 6, 1994

Stratton Jon & Ien Ang (1994) 'Multicultural Imagined Communities: Cultural Difference and National Identity in Australia and the USA', Continuum, 8.2 (Critical Multiculturalism issue), 124-158

Taylor, Charles and Gutman, Amy ed. (1994) Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, Princeton University Press: Princeton, New Jersey

Trinh, T. Minh-ha (1989) Woman, Native, Other : Writing Postcoloniality and Feminism, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Ware, Vron (1992) Beyond the Pale: White Women, Racism and History, Verso: London

West, Cornel (1993) Race Matters, Beacon Press: Boston

Wong, Sau-lin C. (1993) Reading Asian American Literature, Princeton University Press: Princeton, New Jersey

Young, Robert (1990) White Mythologies: Writing, History and the West, Routledge: London

Yúdice, George (1995) 'Neither Impugning nor Disavowing Whiteness Does a Viable Politics Make: The Limits of Identity Politics', After Political Correctness: The Humanities and Society in the 1990s, ed. Christopher Newfield & Ronald Strickland, Westview Press: Boulder, pp. 255-285.

Sneja Gunew

University of British Columbia, Canada